### Is it possible to beat the bookmakers at their own game and win money over the long-term by betting on horse racing without any knowledge of the sport? Does betting using purely a pricing edge really lead to success? Find out in the **Pursue FIRE | Full Guide to Each Way Betting!**

**Hustlin’**

While a big part of getting your financial house in order is undoubtedly managing expenses and saving more, the flip side is, of course, to find ways to **earn more**. Outside of traditional means, such as your day job, we need to look for some **side hustles** with earning potential.

I always encourage people to pursue side hustles wherever possible. You never know where they might lead and anything that can **diversify your income** is a good thing in my book. I’ll talk about some of my other side hustles in future posts including the simply amazing **Merch by Amazon** **(MBA)** programme.

For the purposes of this guide, however, I want to walk your through **betting on horse racing**….. 😮 okay you can stop laughing at me now. I’m serious!

You may have seen my **Monthly Each Way Betting Reports**, in which I break out profits achieved over a given month as well as looking at some of the key statistics. You can check those out here:

I also maintain a page that shows * live results *achieved since starting in early July. This updates daily. Be sure to check that out too for an up to date picture!

If you are still laughing, I should point out that in the short space of time that I have started each way betting I have **doubled my money**, achieving well over a **100% growth** in my bank, and a return on investment **(ROI) of 16%**. 😉

**Inspiration**

Indeed I am not the first person to think that betting on horses might offer some return potential. Earlier this year, I stumbled across a number of other financial independence bloggers that were having some notable success.

Chief among these was **TheFireStarter**. If you are not familiar, this is a really well established **UK-based personal finance blog** of several years and I highly recommend you take the time to visit. There is some great content there and some very motivating results to inspire anyone on their journey to **financial independence!** In fact, the site, along with several others, inspired me to launch **Pursue FIRE! **

So, sparked by their success, and having read further on the topic, it was time to start my own little **horse betting side hustle!**

**Disclaimer Alert**

It’s important to stress that the strategy I’m going to discuss is **pure gambling** at the end of the day! Please bear that in mind and if its something you ultimately decide to try for yourself, please only allocate funds that you can afford to lose. I’d argue that, with a **sensible staking strategy** and **appropriate risk management**, that is unlikely to happen but it could *(in theory)*. So proceed at your own risk! Please also note that this guide includes **affiliate links** to **OddsMonkey.** In my opinion, each way betting would not be possible without the brilliant** Eachway Matcher** **Tool**. If you are interested to try it out, please consider following the link. You can try the features out and **OddsMonkey** offer a full 30-day, 100% money-back guarantee if it’s not for you.

In most corners of the financial independence community, ** ‘gambling’** would rank pretty low as a means to build wealth. Let’s be realistic – do I expect to make my millions betting on horses? Of course not. But if it can bring in a few extra bucks to pay down the mortgage or invest into funds, then I’m game.

This guide is going to be on the long side… so I’ll break it down into **two main sections**. In the first, we’ll cover some basics, including:

**What is each way betting?****How are ‘place’ positions determined****How are the odds compiled****Some worked examples**

Once we have that down, we’ll move onto the second half of the guide where we will explore in more detail:

**How to pick the right horses with the amazing OddsMonkey Eachway Matcher Tool****Bookmaker accounts and Bankroll strategy****Filtering and screening for bets****Measuring your progress****Other tips and tricks**

So let’s get down to business and get into the specifics of each way betting on horses…

## Part 1 – The Basics:

## What Is Each Way Betting?

**Each way betting** is a popular way to increase the chances of getting a return when betting, and is a very common type of bet in horse racing and in some other sports too, including greyhound racing and even golf!

With an each way bet you are actually spreading your total stake across more than one outcome. So, rather than betting solely on a horse to win a race, we actually make two bets on the same horse; a * ‘win bet’* and a

*.*

**‘place bet’**The **win portion** of the bet should be self-explanatory, whilst the **place part** of the bet involves backing the same horse to finish within a predetermined number of positions in the race or * ‘places’*.

Importantly, each part of the bet must be an **equal stake ***(split 50:50)*.

So, for example, if you placed a **£5 each-way bet** on a horse, you will have **£5 on the win portion** of the bet and **£5 on the place portion** of the bet, totalling a **£10 overall stake**.

The each way bet will payout if * either portion of the bet* proves to be successful. If a chosen horse wins a race,

**both portions**of the bet payout because the horse won the race and therefore, by default, also finished in the top positions. If the chosen horse does not win outright but finishes in the place positions, your bet will pay out on the

**place portion only**.

Needless to say, if a chosen horse fails to win or finish in the place positions, you’d **lose the total stake**, for example, £10.

**How Are ‘Place’ Positions Determined?**

The number of **place positions** offered in a race by a bookmaker will vary depending on a number of factors and this can not only vary from bookmaker to bookmaker, but also from one event to another. While it does not really change our approach to choosing the bets themselves, it is always worth knowing how many places are being offered when taking a bet.

Probably the most significant factor in determining the number of places offered is the **number of horses running** in a given race. The more horses that run, the more places are offered and vice versa. Here is a quick run-down for reference:

- Place betting is not typically allowed on races with between
**two and four runners**. - If the race has between
**five and seven runners**, place betting is typically available on the**first-placed finisher**, and also the**second-place finisher.** - A race with
**eight or more runners**will normally provide each way betting options that include the**first, second,**and**third place**finishers.

There are also special rules that apply to * handicap races* when it comes to each way betting. The task of predicting the place finishes of horses in a handicap horse race is made considerably more complex by the fact that

*(in theory at least)*every horse has an

**equal chance**of winning the race.

Because handicap races are therefore considered to be harder to accurately place each way bets on, bookmakers typically offer an * extra placed finish* as an option in each way bets on races involving

**16 or more runners**.

For the vast majority of races in which I have had a bet to date, the first three positions *(1st, 2nd, and 3rd)* are the most common.

**How Are The Odds Compiled?**

Obviously, the odds to place in a race are going to be less generous than those to win the race as the **probability of winning** is less than the probability of finishing in the top few positions. The odds you see when making your initial selection are always based on the **outright win**. The odds to place are less obvious at the time of betting, but these are a **fraction** of the advertised win odds.

Typically, all races will pay **1/5 of the win odds**, except in all races of **less than 8 runners**, or in **handicaps of 12 runners or more**. For these races, the place payout is usually **1/4 the win odds**. This can vary with bookmakers so it’s always worth checking when putting your bets on.

Calculating the overall return potential from an each way bet is, therefore, a little more complicated as it involves **combining the odds** offered on the win bet and the place bet. Again, we don’t really need to worry about doing this ourselves, but I think it’s helpful to have a basic understanding.

Right…. why don’t we summarise what we have learned so far by way of two examples. What follows are two recent bets from one of my own betting accounts; one where a horse **wins** the race resulting in **both parts** of the bet paying out; and a second example where the horse only **places** in the race, resulting in **only the place part** of the bet paying out. Hopefully, this will help bring these concepts to life.

**A Winning Example**

The screenshot below is taken from my **Bet365 mobile betting app**, one of several mobile betting apps I use daily. While each bookmakers app will be laid out slightly different, they will all generally follow a similar format and show the same information.

In this example, the race in question was the **3:45 pm at Ayr** on the **2nd October**. I had chosen to place an **each way bet** on a horse called **‘ Redarna’** at decimal odds of

**9.00**for a total stake of

**£10.**

If you recall, our stake in a bet of this nature is **split equally** across both the win part of the bet and the place part of the bet at **£5 on each**.

Again, the win part of the bet should be self-explanatory, but in terms of the place part of the bet, we can see that in this particular race, **3 places** were being offered by Bet 365 *(i.e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd positions)* and that the odds for placing in those positions were offered at **¼ the stated win odds** of **9.0**.

While we do not need to calculate the place odds ourselves I’ll show you how it’s done for your own understanding. You simply take the stated win odds, subtract 1.0 before dividing by the fraction, and then adding back the 1.0. So, in this example, our **place odds** would be derived as follows:

- Win odds of 9.0, subtract 1.0 = 8.0
- Divide 8.0 by the quoted fraction (in this case 4) = 2.0
- Add back the 1.0 =
**place odds of 3.0**

So our * maximum potential return* would be achieved if

*wins the race as that would result in both the win and the place bet paying out as follows:*

**‘Redarna’****Win bet**=*£5 x odds of 9.0 =***£45****Place bet**=*£5 x place odds of 3.0 =***£15****Total Return**=**£60**

However, the ‘*total return’* does includes our **initial stake** of £10 *(£5 on each part of the bet)*. So in terms of **actual profit** should * ‘Redarna’* win the race this would be £60 minus our stake of £10, leaving us with

**£50 of profit**.

Luckily, * ‘Redarna’* romped home in

**1st place**and so I pocketed from both sides of the bet as shown below 🙂

**Placed Example**

Staying with **Bet365**, the next screenshot shows another recent bet I took.

In this example, the race in question was the **2:30 pm** at **Sedgefield** also on the **2nd of October**. I chose to place an **each way bet** on a horse called * ‘Ballyfarsoon’* at decimal odds of

**17.0**, again for a total stake of

**£10**.

As before, my stake was therefore * split equally *across both the win part of the bet and the place part of the bet at

**£5 on each**.

In similar fashion to our previous example, we can see that in this particular race, **3 places** were offered *(i.e. 1st, 2nd and 3rd)* but this time the odds for placing were **⅕ of the win odds** as it was a larger field of runners. So, in this example, our **place odds** would be derived as follows:

- Win odds of 17.0, subtract 1.0 = 16.0
- Divide 16.0 by the quoted fraction (in this case 5) = 3.2
- Add back the 1.0 =
**place odds of 4.2**

So our * maximum potential return* would be achieved if

*wins the race as that would result in both the win and the place bet paying out as follows:*

**‘Ballyfarsoon’**- Win bet = £5 x odds of 17.0 = £85
- Place bet = £5 x place odds of 4.2 = £21
- Total Return =
**£106**

As before, the total return includes our initial stake of £10 *(£5 on each part of the bet)*. So in terms of actual profit should Ballyfarsoon win the race this would be £106 – £10 = **£96**

While * ‘Ballyfarsoon’* did not win the race, it did still

**place**having finished in 2nd place. This means that we lost the win part of the bet, but profited from the place part of the bet as shown below:

## Part 2 – The Detail:

**How To Pick The Right Horses?**

Now that we understand the **type of bet** we are looking to make, the **different scenarios** in which we might win, how the **odds are calculated** and what determines the **number of places** offered, the next obvious question is how to go about **picking which horses to bet on!**

Don’t worry! You don’t need to know a shady guy down the pub or subscribe to the **Racing Post** ;-). I personally know **nothing about horses** other than not to stand behind one! So don’t let a lack of racing knowledge deter you from this endeavour.

The horses we ultimately will choose to bet on will be handed to us on a plate via some clever software from **OddsMonkey** and their brilliant **Eachway Matcher Tool**.

If you are not already familiar, **OddsMonkey** is a web-based piece of software that **automatically** finds the best odds for you, aggregated across all the different bookmakers, saving you precious amounts of time. There are other alternatives out there, but as I have only ever used **OddsMonkey **for this project, I can’t vouch for what other services might be like.

“I personally don’t see how it would be possible to do each way betting any other way.”

In short, the **Eachway Matcher Tool** compares the prices offered by the bookmakers with those available on the **betting exchanges** *(think Betfair, Smarkets, Betdaq etc)* and highlights differences between the true odds on the exchange versus those available at the bookmaker. It then ranks this differential *(i.e. expected value or edge)* for us with all the information we need to take the bet with the specified bookmaker.

You see, the place terms and odds offered by bookmakers are not based on **probability**. They simply either offer 1/4 or 1/5 of the odds *(as we learned earlier)* based on the size of the field or type of race. Prices for the place market on the betting exchanges, however, such as Betfair, are based on probability and are continually reflecting new information and are therefore **true odds** which lead the changes in bookmaker odds. So when the prices between the two move out of line it presents **value prices** for us to exploit with the bookmakers.

## Why Is The Exchange Price Relevant?

Because bookmakers don’t like losing and will quickly ban or restrict the really shrewd punters, for example, horse race owners, trainers, and others in the inner circle with an intimate knowledge of the industry.

Therefore, the only way to have a flutter if you are a shrewd punter is via the betting exchanges rather than the traditional bookmakers. When you place a bet with the bookmaker, it’s effectively you versus them, and in order to mitigate their risk, they will effectively take the opposite view. On the exchanges, punters can both back a horse to win (a **back bet**) and also back a horse to lose (a **lay bet**) – essentially playing the role of bookmaker by offering a price they are willing to lay a horse for another punter to back.

This means that punters money is matched with other punters money. You think a horse will win and back it, someone else thinks that the same horse will lose and lays it. The exchange simply takes a commission and does not care one way or the other who is right or who is wrong. They have no skin in the game so to speak and because of this, no one ever gets banned from betting on the exchanges. Shrewd bettors are very much welcome and the volumes of bets via the exchanges can be significant!

“Elsewhere, I do a fair bit of tennis trading via the Betfair Exchange and it is not uncommon to see

several million poundsmatched on a single tennis match at a major tournament.”

So we can assume that if the odds on a horse are **shortening on the exchange** compared to a bookmaker, there is **‘smart money’** driving that price down, thereby implying a **higher probability** of that horse winning or placing. Remember, the bookmaker place odds are not based on probability. In these scenarios, we will do well to pick up that horse at a higher price via the bookmaker.

So back to our **Eachway Matcher Tool** for a moment! Imagine trying to crunch the numbers in this fashion manually? Could you really capture second-by-second up to date prices across hundreds of bookmakers, compare these to fast-changing prices on the betting exchanges, oh and calculate a gizzilion sums and probabilities in the process! I repeat I can’t see how this would be possible without this or a similar tool – it is a seriously awesome piece of software. As a result, it does come at a slight cost, but its worth every penny and our profits should easily accommodate the subscription cost. In my monthly reports, I always show the profits net of subscription costs and you will see that the profits dwarf the costs of using the tool.

But before we get into the Eachway Matcher Tool in more depth, we will first need to get set up for success.

**Bookmaker Accounts**

You can’t place bets without having **betting accounts** up and running and funded with some cash. Luckily, I had several existing accounts from my other sports betting activities over the years but if you are starting out, I’d suggest opening **a handful of accounts** with some of the most established bookmakers out there – the likes of **Bet365**, **William Hill**, **Ladbrokes** and so on.

Opening an account and adding some funds is a simple and quick process – it literally takes minutes. As a new customer, you may even benefit from some promotional offers, such as free bets or money back on your first losing bet for example.

**How Many Accounts Do I Need?**

Each Way Betting can be done with a large variety of bookmakers and you can increase the number you use with time and experience. Starting off with too many however will only complicate things while you are learning the ropes so, initially at least, I’d **limit this to 4-5 **to get started.

Nowadays, most bookmakers have **apps for your smartphone** and I personally find these a lot **easier and faster** to navigate than their main websites. This can be a huge advantage when placing bets as you have to move pretty fast to capture good value prices before the bookmakers adjust them. I personally gather all my betting apps into a folder on my **iPhone** so I can quickly go straight to them when needed. Here is an example:

The added advantage if doing this via your phone is the * portability* to place bets on the move, be it a train journey, sat in a boring meeting or even on the toilet at work 😉

Once you have placed a few bets, you’ll be a * seasoned pro* at quickly navigating each bookmakers app to find the race and horse you are targeting and placing your bets with ease.

**Bankroll Strategy**

In terms of how much money to deposit with each bookmaker – that is a personal choice. I’d first settle on what your **total bank** for this project will be and then act accordingly. Remember, **this is gambling** and you should only commit what you are prepared to lose. Needless to say, this should form a very small percentage of your liquid assets, especially at the beginning.

My own personal decision was to commit **£500** to each way betting. I then decided to adopt a **risk tolerance level of 1%** of my starting bank per bet – therefore risking **£5 per bet** *(£2.50 each way stakes)*.

Rather than having the entire £500 sat in bookmaker accounts, I decided to use **half of my available bank** to initially fund 5 bookmakers at **£50 each** *(£250 in total)*, keeping the remaining £250 in my own accounts to fund other bookmaker accounts or top up the existing ones if required once I got started.

So that’s **£50 deposited with each bookmaker**. At 1% total risk per bet *(£5)* that gives me sufficient cushion to get started. You don’t want to be topping up accounts every time you lose a trade as that would be very time consuming, so at £50 per bookmaker and £5 per bet *(split £2.50 each way)*, it meant that I could accommodate **10 consecutive losing bets** before the bookmaker account hits zero. This felt comfortable to me but you are free to follow your own path.

**OddsMonkey Subscription**

OK, now that we have our bookmaker accounts ready and funded, we can go ahead and get our hands on without a doubt the **most important tool** that will enable us to screen for positive expected value and our qualifying bets. We need access to the **Eachway Matcher Tool** we discussed previously available from **OddsMonkey**.

**Eachway Matcher Tool**

There are many more uses for** OddsMonkey** than each way betting, particularly if you enjoy **matched betting** in general, so the subscription is great value for money but for our purposes, we are only interested in the **Eachway Matcher Tool** for this guide.

Once you are signed up with an account, sign-in and navigate to the **Tools Tab**, scroll to the **Matchers **sub-category and select the **Eachway Matcher**.

You’ll then be presented with a screen like this:

At first glance, this may appear **intimidating** but rest assured it’s much simpler than it looks, and once you have used the tool a number of times it will become second nature. In fact, we are only really interested in a handful of columns, most of which are self-explanatory.

Here is a quick run-down of the columns shown and what they mean:

**Event Time**: The date and time of the race**Details**: location*(i.e. track)*and time of the race**Bet**: The horse we are looking to use in our bet**Bookmaker**: The bookmaker with which we will be placing our each way bet**Odds**: the current available odds from that bookmaker**Win exchange**: This is the betting exchange where the tool is comparing the**win price**to the bookmaker**Place exchange**: This is the betting exchange where the tool is comparing the**place price**to the bookmaker**Runners**: this shows us the number of horses in the race**Rating (%)**: This is the**implied percentage profit per bet**. For example, if the rating is 107%, we would make £7 profit per £100 bet (based on a £50 each way)

**While that sounds like a lot of detail, but we are only really interested in one column specifically and that is the Rating (%) column **which shows you the expected value of the bet which is a combination of the expected value of the place and win parts of the each way bet.

**Customised Settings**

The next task is to apply some **filters** so that you only see the results relevant to the bookmakers you have opened accounts with. There are more than **100 bookmakers** active within the tool so it makes little sense to clutter your screen with prices for bookmakers that you do not have active accounts with. Click on **Filter** button and, under **Bookmakers**, check the boxes for those bookmakers for which you have accounts up and running. Remember to **save your changes** so that you won’t have to repeat the process each time you log in!

In the same window, we can also state what our preferred **minimum odds** and **rating** should be. At the bottom of the filter table, you’ll have the option to change these to your preference.

So, aside from filtering the bookmakers, the only other settings I change are the **Each Way Rating** and the **Back Odds**. I personally do not wish to see ratings of less than **95%** and I like my minimum odds to be at least **6**. Why 6? because if only your place bet wins with odds of 6 you should at least **break even**.

Think about it, if our each way bet fails to win, but places, those place odds are likely to be offered at 1/4 or 1/5 of the winning odds.

So let’s say you have £5 riding on the place portion of your bet, based on a £10 total each way bet *(the other half of which lost because the horse did not win)*. This would equate to place odds of **2.25** *(at 1/4 odds)* or **2** *(at 1/5 odds)*. In these scenarios, our £5 stake would return us **£11.25** or **£10** respectively. Subtracting our initial £10 stake from the return would, therefore, see us eek out either a small profit of £1.25 or breakeven at zero for that bet overall.

If the minimum odds were less than 6, let’s say** 4.0**, then this would equate to place odds of **1.75** *(at 1/4 odds)* or **1.6** *(at 1/5 odds)*. In these scenarios, our £5 stake would return **£8.75** or **£8** respectively. Subtracting our initial £10 stake from the return would, therefore, see us make a loss, despite achieving a place position.

For me, if a horse is going to place I want to at least cover my stake. I know some people happily accept odds below 6.0 but this is just what has worked for me so far.

Again, these are just the settings I have found to work for me. You are of course free to adjust these to your preference.

“Remember that as you open and add money with other bookmakers, you’ll need to update the filtered list and add the additional bookmakers in order to see their odds.”

**Screening For Bets**

There is no set rule when it comes to setting your selection criteria for races, but I follow a **fairly popular methodology** to screen for suitable bets. If **any** of the following conditions are met, I’ll place a bet with the highlighted bookie as long as the quoted price in the odds column is still available with the bookmaker when placing the bet.

- If both the Win and Place is showing
**Betfair**and the**Rating is is over 95%** - If both the Win and Place is showing as
**Smarkets**and the**Rating is over 98%** - If the Win and Place is a combination of
**Betfair**plus**any other exchange**and the Rating is over**97%**

You may ask why these combinations? The ratings in **OddsMonkey** are calculated including the commission rates with the respective betting exchanges. So, for example, Betfair Exchange charge customers a 5% commission on winning trades. Because we are not laying off our bets via the exchange, then a rating that is higher than 95% actually becomes >100% for our purposes. Anything over 100% means we have **positive expected value** in the bet and should take it. The commission is charged at 2% on Smarkets, hence the minimum 98% rating required.

There is some excellent discussion on the **OddsMonkey **forums about different settings, but those stated above have worked well for me so far.

**Making Selections Example**

All that is left to do is to sort the results by **Rating (%)** and enable **auto-refresh** so that the most up to date results are shown with the highest ratings at the top of the page. Let’s take a look at another screenshot to highlight some picks that I would make based on our criteria above.

Here we can see a number of potential bets. All of the bets show a rating over 95% which is the minimum we need to see. From there, we can see there are a few horses that qualify based on our criteria above.

In this example, I choose to bet on * ‘Classical Milano’* which is priced at decimal odds to win of 8.0 with a number of bookmakers. His rating is over 95% and both the win and place exchanges show as

**Betfair**so we have a qualifying bet.

Keeping with our **Bet365** examples in this guide, I jump onto my mobile app, locate the Hexham race at 3:25 pm, find * ‘Classical Milano’* and double check that the odds of 8.0 are still available. From there, I just have to ensure I check the each way box at the foot of the bet slip after entering my stake, in this case £5. This means I have a £10 total stake, split between £5 on the win part of the bet at odds of 8.0 and £5 on the place part of the bet which will be at 1/5 of the win odds.

Recalling our previous calculation example, this means that the place odds will be **2.40** *(8.0, subtract 1.0, divide by 5, add back the 1.0)*

This means that the maximum I can return for this bet will be **£52** *(£42 profit after subtracting the £10 stake) *broken out as follows:

- Win bet = £5 x odds of 8.0 = £40
- Place bet = £5 x place odds of 2.4 = £12
- Total Return potential =
**£52**

Based on the selection we identified above, here is how the bet slip would look:

From, there you repeat as required until you have a good number of selections for the day. I personally aim for at least 10 bets in a day. In the three months, I have been doing each way betting, I’m averaging around 12 bets per day.

**Measuring Your Progress**

With potentially a dozen or more bets per day on the table, you will then need the means to capture all of the activity and analyse your results over time. Step forward my favourite spreadsheet of choice – **Google Sheets**. You can of course use whichever method suits you.

For speed and simplicity, I track just a few essential data points I need to judge the success of my bets over time and a lot of these data points are automated. These include:

*Meet**Date**Month**Type**Race time**Bet**Bookmaker**Stake**Odds**Result**Running Profit/Loss**Total stakes**Running Return on Investment (ROI)**Running Bank*

Here is a snapshot of my results spreadsheet to give you a sense of how this looks:

I then have a series of **connected sheets** that take this data and summarise how the results are doing. I’m a bit of a data nerd, so I have charts and tables all fed and updated automatically from this one sheet.

You may have already seen my **monthly updates** which break down my betting into different statistics I like to see. I also have my **live results page** which updates as I record bets. This is achieved by connecting my google sheet to **Google Data Studio** -a free data visualisation tool that is amazing!

**Daily Routine**

So I appreciate a lot has been detailed in this post and I thank you for making it this far! Perhaps it would be helpful to give you an idea of a typical morning routine:

- Update my results spreadsheet from the day before and ensure that my bookmaker balances tally with my data
- Launch the OddsMonkey Eachway Matcher Tool
*(usually from 9:30 am till around 12 pm)*to start screening for bets. My settings are all saved so there is nothing else to do other than**sort by rating**and ensure the**autorefresh**is on to keep the page updated - When a qualifying bet is shown, I pop onto the bookmaker app, find the race and horse and place an
**each way bet**at my chosen stake, ensuring that the price shown is still the same as shown in the Each Way Matcher Tool – if it has fallen, you**don’t place the bet**as the pricing edge has been lost - Once placed, I make a quick note in my race monitor spreadsheet – this helps me keep track of horses I’ve already bet on and ensure I’m not placing too many horses in a single race or betting on the same horse twice
*(it happens!)* - Once I have between 10-20 completed bets, I copy the details over to my results sheet, order these by race time
- As the results come in, I record whether it was a win, loss, place or non-runner/void and add the corresponding profit/loss accordingly

Periodically I will check the stats page to see how my profit is building and where the balance of my funds sit with the different bookmakers. It may be necessary to **withdraw from one to top up another** so that you don’t lose potential bets from a bookmaker where your balance is not sifficient to bet.

It’s then just a case of rinse and repeat 🙂

**What To Expect**

As mentioned, you can realistically expect to see **at least 10 qualifying bets per day**, potentially many more depending on your settings and the number of bookmakers you choose to use at any one time. One of the most important things you should expect is that the **majority of your bets will lose!** When starting out this may discourage you at first, but stick with it and you’ll see that it is very possible to extract very good returns despite having such a small win rate!

In fact, as at the time of writing this guide, I have completed more than **760 bets** and turned a **116% profit** *(net of the OddsMonkey subscription)* this despite 450 of my bets **(58%) being losing bets**.

**Others Helpful Tips and Tricks**

Having now placed more than **700 individual bets**, there are a few other handy tricks and tips that you may benefit from. In no particular order, these include:

**Multiple Screens**– Between the Eachway Matcher Tool, the betting platforms and a spreadsheet your screen real estate can get crowded. If you are fortunate to have access to two monitors at work or at home this can really speed things up. Alternatively, the Eachway Matcher Tool looks great on an iPad.**Boosted Odds**– some bookmakers offer one or two**boosted odds**offers every day. This is awesome as it means we can turbo charge odds that we already know are great value for even great profit potential**Lapsed Prices**– prices can move really fast, especially if a horse shows up with a really high rating in the Eachway Matcher Tool*(e.g. >120%)*. The shrewd operators out there jump on those prices and they very quickly adjust at the bookmakers. If the price has changed*(i.e. shortened)*from what you see in the Eachway Matcher Tool,**don’t be tempted to chase it**. The expected value will have been eroded at the new price so move onto another selection. You never know, that same horse may show up again in the Eachway Matcher Tool later as and when a new differential between the bookmaker and the exchange comes up**The optimal mix of odds**– my personal preference is to have a**good mix of odds**when placing my bets on any given day. Obviously, the shorter the odds, the higher the probability of a horse winning or placing so I try and avoid just having really long shots backed on a given day. I like to see a combination of shorter priced horses*(decimal odds of 10.0 or less)*mixed with longer priced horses*(decimal odds of 10.0 and upwards)***The number of bets per race**– it’s important to be mindful of the number of runners in a race. Not only will this determine the number of places offered*(which is obviously important)*but it should also steer how many horses in a single race you may want to back*(assuming the Eachway Matcher Tool is showing them)*. It’s fine to back more than one horse in a single race, but I’d limit it to between 2 and 4 depending on the size of the field and the number of places offered. So, in a race with 8 horses don’t back all of them just because they show up in the tool. In a large field backing up to 4 horses is okay in my opinion.**Multiples**– While I have not done many of these to date, you can combine each way bets together into multiple bets*(doubles, trebles etc)*. The premise is the same but the payout on the bet is dependant on each bet coming good. These can offer very high return potential but are obviously harder to pull off. I’d recommend reducing your risk on these to 0.5%.

## Summary

Well done, you have made it to the end of this rather **lengthy guide!** Thank you for taking the time to read through it. While it may appear technical in nature, the actual premise and application of the strategy are very straightforward.

I’ve tried my best to explain this is clear and simple terms, but if anything is confusing or you’d like something explained further please do not hesitate to let me know and I will update the guide accordingly. I’m so far into it now that its all become second nature, which can make explaining it to someone new potentially challenging, so let me know if you are stuck.

I also plan to add a video showing you how I personally navigate the **Eachway Matcher Tool** in more depth and do a walk-through of a typical bet.

Remember, if you’d like to try each way betting yourself you’ll need a subscription to the **OddsMonkey** website to leverage the essential **Eachway Matcher Tool**. You can do that** here**

I look forward to hearing about your successes in due course. Good luck!

Dan

## This Post Has 29 Comments

## Alan

7 Oct 2018Excellent guide, thank you. I have been doing each wayarbing since July with a 21% return on £5 each way stakes. £1200 up.

## Pursue FIRE

9 Oct 2018Cheers Alan – glad you liked the guide and I wish you continued success in the months ahead!

Dan

## Rob

3 Nov 2018Hi Dan,

Absolutely cracking guide (and blog in general).

I discovered your blog whilst browsing the comments over at TFS’s blog and I’ve now saved this in my favourites to follow.

I do have a couple of questions for you about Each Way Betting and how you personally approach it, so I thought I’d throw them in here so others can benefit too if you’re able to answer.

1 – You’ve mentioned minimum odds of 6.0, but do you have any criteria for maximum odds or is the sky your limit above 6.0?

2 – Do you have any criteria where the number of runners in a race is concerned? For example, “I will only bet on selections in races that have 12 or less runners”.

Thanks,

Rob

## Pursue FIRE

3 Nov 2018Hi Rob and thanks for stopping by and commenting. I’m new to this blogging lark so comments such as these are a great source of inspiration to keep going!

So let me tackle your questions:

1) As I lay out in the guide, I do go with a minimum of odds of 6.0 to ensure at least a breakeven should a horse with odds of 6 achieve a place. I know others may go lower, but 6.0 seems logical for me. In terms of maximum odds, I don’t have a set maximum. I’m guessing your question is really about determining at what level a horse essentially has no chance of winning or placing and does it still make sense to stake money on such long odds?

If we recap that the OddsMonkey tool is presenting us with value bets, this implies that the prices are too generous on the bookmakers versus what is going on at the betting exchanges. For this to happen is mostly involves some volume of money going on that horse on the exchange to engineer a shortening of the price.

If a horse has odds of 100 – it essentially has zero probability of winning and its probably common knowledge that its a major dud – so not smart money will be going anywhere near such horses. I have not seen a horse come up in OddsMonkey anywhere that price, but I do take them as high as 50-60 maybe more. Again, if the tool says there is the value I’ll take it, but in all reality, it will be very rare to see a ridiculous long priced horse show up with the kind of rating we look for.

It can feel counter-intuitive to stake the same on a horse with odds of 60 as you will with a horse priced at 6. Clearly, one has a significantly greater chance of placing than the other, but if you believe that you should load up on short-priced horses and bet peanuts on the long priced ones. It’s too much guesswork and you’ll be jumping around with different risk per bets each time. Just take the value when you see it and stick to a disciplined risk budget and (over time) that pricing edge will bear fruit.

Occasionally a long-priced horse will place and that can yield some of the biggest wins!

2) Regarding the number of runners – when I started out I would generally only bet on 1 or 2 horses max per race as a rule but as time has gone up I do sometimes end up betting on 5 or 6 on occasion. The key factors are the size of the field; the number of places offered and the presence of value bets. So In a large field of (let’s say) 16 runners, you’ll most likely get 4 places offered. If the OddsMonkey Each Way Tool spits out 4 value bets on that race, I’ll take them all and possibly a few more if the tool presents them. In these scenarios, I do prefer to have a good mixture of long and short odd selections (i.e. I would not want 4 selections at really long odds), but a good mixture I find is good. It’s like laying traps around the field and you are just hoping to nab a win or a place.

Obviously, in a short field of 8 or less, 3 places will be typical (sometimes 2) so there is little sense in backing every horse so I might limit that to 1 or 2.

In addition to taking these bets as singles, I’ve also been doing a lot more multiples (i.e. duplicating the same bets as double or treble selections) I do this at much-reduced stakes though as the probability of everything coming off is obviously less than a straight single selection.

Hope that helps Rob and let me know if I can help with anything else. I look forward to hearing about your successes with Each Way Betting.

Dan

## Rob

4 Nov 2018Hi Dan,

Thanks for your answering. First answer makes perfect sense, as does second answer but it doesn’t answer the question I meant to ask, probably because I wasn’t very clear with my wording. It’s quite difficult to word the question without it sounding like I’m asking how many horses would you bet on in one race, but I’ll have another go.

Let’s just say for examples sake that we only ever place a bet on one horse per race, just to remove that from the equation as it’s not relevant to my question really.

So when you’re looking through the bets the Each Way Matcher is pulling out and it lists the number of runners in the race, do you have any criteria when it comes to a maximum number of runners in a race?

For example, you might say to yourself “I will not place a bet on a race that has 12 or more runners in the race”, with the thought being that if there are more than 12 runners, your chances of hitting a win or place decreases as the number of runners increases. It doesn’t matter whether you’re baking one horse or five in that race, it doesn’t meet your criteria if there are over 12 horses running in it.

Am I making any sense at all here?! It’s been a long day 🙂

Thanks again,

Rob

## Pursue FIRE

5 Nov 2018Hi Rob – no worries and apologies if I misinterpreted your initial question 🙂

The simple answer is no. I do not have any set criteria around the number of runners in a race in terms of choosing to bet in that race or not (even in a 1 bet per race scenario). I do not set the Each Way Tool in any way to filter out races by field size. I like to see them all and take the value when it’s presented.

Do remember though that as the field size grows, the number of places does increase (not in a linear way of course), so you are compensated in some ways by the field being larger. But I’d also suggest that the probability of a horse winning or placing for us is driven more by its price than how many horses it is competing against but I see your point. But the probability for a given horse does not reduce (in a linear fashion) with the addition of another horse. (i.e. larger field). I guess this might be the case in the unlikely scenario where every horse was priced identically (and any additional horses also priced the same).

Betting odds are just implied probabilities expressed a different way. So let’s say a price for a horse is 4.0 – its probability of winning is 25% regardless of whether it’s competing against 6 or 20 horses. Let me know if that helps

Thanks

Dan

## Rob

5 Nov 2018Excellent. Yes that’s exactly what I meant.

Thanks again. I’ll let you know how I get on.

## Pursue FIRE

5 Nov 2018No problem Rob – best of luck with it!

## Philip Clarke

24 Nov 2018Good work PF. What strikes me is how similar your filter selection is to mine and how alike your and my spreadsheets are. I’ve been tracking my wagering informally for several years, I retired at Easter (relatively early) and decided then that it was time to start keeping proper records, devise a formal strategy and stick to it. Like you I maintain a central wagers table with a series of pivot tables hanging off it, breaking the bet history down by type, month etc. The main differences are that I calculate and show the win and place part of the bet (for no particular reason), and in addition to EW sniping I do some no-lay accas and follow a couple of tipsters, so I need to capture who recommended the selection plus the ability to process win-only bets.

You do more dicing and slicing than me; I record the bookmaker but don’t track balances at that level. I can do that well enough in my head and I have a low and high threshold for each bookie, currently £50 and £200. If a bookmaker account falls below the low number I top up and if it goes above the higher I withdraw to an account dedicated to the purpose.

Since mid-May, I’ve made 563 bets, generating a profit of £953 on stakes of £3879 (ROI 25%). The EW betting dates from mid August and contributed a return of £390 on stakes of £765 (ROI 51%) over 205 bets. I have been in the black every month bar one.

As I started with a nominal £200 , my bankroll just breached £1100 (having a great November, up £384). This is good because I stake 1% of bankroll so my stake is now over £10 which means I usually qualify for some ‘free bet’ loyalty weekly offers (Coral and PaddyPower), giving a modest boost to returns.

Good luck!

## Pursue FIRE

24 Nov 2018Hi Philip! It’s always great to hear others that follow a similar mindset! I live in spreadsheets pretty much, both in the day job and in terms of all things personal finance. In earlier versions of my sheet, I had both the win and place odds all automated (in terms of working out the profit, taking into account the number of places offered etc) so all I had to do was mark whether it was a win, place, loss or non-Runner. It worked perfectly but I found that the bookmaker returns would (fairly frequently) be out by a small amount based on things you can’t foresee, such as a horse dropping out and there being a Rule 4 deductions as the field size drops etc. In trying to make my sheet friendly for external consumption I just stripped out all the bits I rarely referenced or used – I figured this would be easier for others.

Great to hear of your success. November remains profitable for me, but I’ve certainly given up a good chunk of profit in the last week – without the doubt the worst run of days I’ve had since starting, but can’t complain. Profit is still profit! You have an awesome ROI! In my other betting and sports trading days, I always considered a long-term ROI of anything over 10% quite impressive. Mine has taken a knock of late but still running in the low teens.

I hope the results keep on coming Philip. Cheers

Dan

## Mark

6 Dec 2018Hello Dan,

Writing to thank you so much for this post!

We had started matched betting recently but had also seen how much success folks like SavingNinja and yourself were posting about each way betting. This post you made really helped break everything down into rules, process and strategy (which certainly suits my preferred style), enough to convince me to make a start.

Brief background too – I was recently made redundant. We had been toying with aiming for FIRE for a year or so, starting to think about cutting back but monitoring our spending more carefully. I hadn’t really shifted my mindset though until the redundancy came along. So, alongside days at home now looking for jobs, the side hustle has started!

I decided to spend a couple of days practising the each way process without placing any bets so that I could get the hang of it, and using your excellent spreadsheet. I’m on day eight working with real money. I’ve found that I place my first 3-4 bets 9am – 12pm, then dip in to add during the next three hours to see how active betting is affecting the table. So far I have a cumulative ‘profit’ of -£58.60 from a total of 80 bets, of £4 each. I have kept referring back to your post to check my logic matches, but additionally being able to reference your actual results spreadsheet too has helped keep me sane and encouraged.

Already, with my semi-statistics background, it’s proved fascinating to see how things are shaping up.

Looking forward to so many more data points to help me refine my approach, and of course the expected positive impact that will have on results.

Curious to know how you manage to find 12ish horses to back between 9am and 12 pm?

## Pursue FIRE

7 Dec 2018Hi Mark and thank you for your kind words about the guide – I’m glad you have found it a useful resource to get you started. I seem to be getting quite a few questions about finding bets. Everyone will see different results of course dependant upon which bookies you are screening bets for, what settings you choose to use, what stake you are betting at etc. Some days a certainly quieter than others but most days I find at least 10 bets between 9-9:30am and 12pm. Like you, I may sometimes dip in again later if time permits to pick up another odd bet here and there. Today, for example, I had 13 bets logged within the first hour or so of looking. I’m using about 8 bookmakers right now and my approach is to leave OddsMonkey up on my iPad while I’m working and I just put the bets on when they come up. Hope that helps Mark!

## Jim McG

2 Feb 2019Hi Dan, thanks for taking the time to put this together. I’ve just started EWS, inspired by (and jealous of) the winnings of TFS, who I’ve followed for some time. I used to do Matched Betting for the free bet offers, but fell out of the way of it, all that betting and laying. This seems a bit easier, and I’ll be interested to see how it turns out. Hope to get a good run at it before the bookies gub me, as they did following Cheltenham one year. Mind you, trying to grab all the offers on that meeting was driving me nuts! Good luck with the betting and the blog, probably see you over at Slack (thanks for setting that up too!)

## Pursue FIRE

7 Feb 2019Cheers Jim McG and welcome to the group on Slack!

## Rhi

6 Feb 2019Love this blog thank you so much for taking the time to do this – great info for those following in your footsteps.

Do you do the arbs – over 100%? I’ve stayed clear of those but within the first week have already been stake restricted by two bookies – how have you managed to keep your accounts healthy?

## Pursue FIRE

7 Feb 2019Hi Rhi – thanks for your question. I don’t really do arbs at the moment. I find EWB the most time efficient way of betting on the horses, whereas I think with arbing you really need to be placing bets in the minutes prior to races. I prefer the set and forget style of EWB around a busy day job, commute, family etc. I went 7 months without any restrictions, and then I’ve had 3 or 4 in the last two weeks – all following massive wins. Gubbings are inevitable so just rinse them for what you can and move on. I don’t know for how long EWB will be viable before getting bets on with bookies becomes an issue. That said, I’m in month 9 and it’s only just starting to happen and I’ve only used about 7 bookmakers thus far (there are hundreds). I know some of my fellow betters also open second accounts etc so lots of room to play with. Cheers

## Bob

6 Feb 2019Found from Facebook group. Been match betting thought I’d try this. Take it doing same horse at mutilple bookies is OK or would you not recommend this

## Pursue FIRE

7 Feb 2019Hi Bob. Thanks for your question. I personally would not advise placing multiple bets on the same horse across different bookies. The win ratio is actually very low in EWB (I average about 10% wins), but with the right staking and risk management that is all you need to make seriously good returns. I can see the appeal of hoping to catch a winner and getting paid multiple times but for me the risk:reward does not stack up. If you choose to do it, I’d advise lowering your stakes for each bet accordingly so that you are not exceeding an overall risk on that horse of 1-2% of your bank. If you did 1% per individual bet say 6 times across different bookies, and that horse does not win or place, that’s 6% of your bank blown on what outcome. It would also depend on the odds. Would you feel comfortable loading up multiple bets on a 41.0 shot in the hope of winning big? I know I would not but each to their own. Just watch your bank. I think success in this (or any betting) is about managing your downside more than anything else. Good luck!

## S G

17 Feb 2019Hi – thanks for the taking the time to write the guide!

A quick question (I may be missing something obvious), but in your example above you took the bet on Classical Milano when there were other runners that met your criteria; namely Shaiyza or Dandy Highwayman. Was there a reason for that or would you also take those bets?

Thanks!

S

## Scott

17 Feb 2019Hi – thanks for taking the time to write the guide!

A quick question which might be really obvious, but there seems to be other runners in your example that met your criteria – namely Shaiyza and Dandy Highwayman, which appeared to provide ‘better’ value. Was there a reason you didn’t select them?

Cheers!

## Pursue FIRE

17 Feb 2019Hi Scott and thanks for your question. There is no reason why the other selections were not chosen. It was just a simple matter of choosing an example where I had an active bet at the time of writing the guide and where I was able to take screenshots on my phone at each stage. I think I may have even had some of those others in other bets. So, yes, the better the value the better the bet (in theory), and I also rank my screen by rating to show the highest ratings at the top of the screen. In this specific example, that race had 8 runners, so I would probably only have 2-3 horses from that race max. Hope that answers your question. Thanks

## Muggins

3 Mar 2019Hi Dan, great guide and really interesting topic!

I’ve been into matched betting a while and have worked in the financial betting/trading markets previously, so I’m always interested in the numbers and the ‘house edge’. Fixed odds/sports betting isn’t my forte, but my understanding is that bookies will make the odds such that the sum of the probabilities of each horse winning is >100%, and so this is their ‘edge’ and they keep the difference between that figure and 100% to ensure profit over the long term. I also then understand that the interesting/profitable thing about EW betting is that the odds you can bet on are derivatives of the winning odds, rather than configured specifically to predict the exact probabilities of horses placing, nor to maintain the house/bookie edge. Where my maths/logic gets a bit hazy is whether one can add up the odds of the EW bets and see if they add up to less than 300% (if the top 3 positions qualify as placing)?

My thinking is that your guide above is focussed on betting on odds that are better at bookies compared with exchanges, but this doesn’t necessarily mean they haven’t maintained their house edge (i.e. the sum of the EW bet probabilities might be >300% still). I wonder, therefore, if there’s something in working out the total probabilities of the odds, and whether you’d get a better ROI on those instances where the sum of the probabilities are 300% and the bookies are effectively giving up their house edge?

Not sure if that all makes sense, but I’m interested in thoughts nonetheless! Thanks 🙂

## Pursue FIRE

4 Mar 2019Great question Muggins! Essentially yes, the bookmakers do ensure they pocket by working to what I think they call the ‘overround’. You are also correct, that EWB is built on the premise that when the odds for a horse to win are shorter on the exchange than they are with the bookmaker, then ‘value’ is offered to the bettor. So, just because there is a differential between exchange and bookmaker, you are right that (in the eyes of the bookmaker at least) they still maintain their overround as all their prices in a given race, will be automatically calculated as such to ensure >100%. I’ve not considered your last point before, nor how to go about doing so but its something I’ll have a think about!

## Muggins

4 Mar 2019I’ve not heard of ‘overround’ before, so thanks for teaching me the term! My brain might be going a little fuzzy now, but thinking about it, I wonder if the overround for the sum of the EW bets is <300%, does that mean if you place an EW bet on all the horses you're guaranteed to make money…? Obviously you'd get gubbed pretty quickly, but does the maths work…?

## Yvonne

21 May 2019hi there I have been doing a bit of each way betting using the matcher.,but I find the feed update to be so slow -the odds have completely changed at the bookmakers- for instance- odds showing as 17 have been cut first to 15,then 11 then 7 and are still showing as 17 on the matcher.Any way found this?

## Pursue FIRE

21 May 2019Hi Yvonne – yes the matcher can certainly lag at times but it is usually okay most of the time. Do you have the automatic refresh button on? Sometimes I forget and I sit there thinking ‘that horse has been there for ages’ only to realise I had not refreshed the page. Other than that, another thing you can do is use the OddsChecker website. This can sometimes be a little quicker and may show you other bookies where the odds are the same as the one in the Matcher (sometimes even better). Checking here will introduce an additional step in what is already a time-sensitive task, but having that open on another tab may be helpful. Let me know how you get on. Thanks

## Yvonne

22 May 2019Thanks for reply-I’m finding your guide really useful and I’m going to try your suggestion today.I have been dabbling with EWNL for a few weeks with mixed results-I seem to be on a downswing at the moment:

780 bets, staked £2361 profit £58 making it ROL=2.4% I think!!

I’m very much a pen and paper person but I have just been looking at your spreadsheet and may try it.One thing I need to stop doing is taking the changed odds and maybe being more selective instead of getting on loads-different approach today-thanks to you

## Pursue FIRE

24 May 2019Hi Yvonne – the last few weeks have been a bit of a grind so achieving any profit feels like a victory. I think I’ve given back about £700 of profit since the second week of the month, but still up £1.7k or so overall so not all bad. Things will turn soon I’m sure as we hit the summer months. The way to think about taking shorter odds than those on the matcher is to consider whether (if the prices in OddsMonkey were as up to date as the bookmaker i.e. shorter) would that horse still show up in the Matcher as a value bet? Probably not. Yes, it might still win or place but by taking it on at reduced odds, you are losing the positive expected value over the bookmaker. I occasionally break the rules too, especially if the extent of the edge (the % rating) is some way over 100 I figure even a small drop in odds would still be a value bet. But other times its worth leaving them alone – sometimes those horses reappear again later in the day as ‘value’ and you can try and catch them a second time. Good luck!

## Twatter

14 Jun 2019Hi

So I’ve been following the method and getting good results. Just today I’ve started to think about the overall combinations of outcomes, and one of the methods that I can’t find much information on is the Each Way Win Lay method, whereby we lay the win market only. Haven’t had time to make a spreadsheet calc of this and think it all through, but what about the strategy whereby an in play lay is placed on the horse at much shorter odds on the win market? I’m not at a spreadsheet to model it all out, but for example you put the back bet on a horse that has perceived value as per normal EW/NL strategy, then place a keep inplay lay bet on win market only say for example half the odds. If the bet never gets matched then we’re no better off than the EWNL. If it’s matched, and horse wins then we win a smaller amount on the arb that’s created. If it places then we still win. I’m sure there’s a major flaw in this, but searched and searched and can’t find anyone who’s dabbled with the idea of laying on the win in play.. any thoughts?